Coalition 2000 is one of
the most prominent examples of a "private-public partnership"
in the area of anti-corruption. It is an all-inclusive platform
combining the input and efforts of various stakeholders irrespective
of their political or institutional affiliations.
The institutional structure of Coalition 2000 builds on three
main elements: |
- Policy Forum of leading public and private institutions
and prominent personalities;
- Steering Committee as the means for coordination;
- Secretariat to provide operational management to the process.
|
Policy Forum |
The Policy Forum convenes
once a year to review the results of the preceding period, and
to provide guidelines for the work over the next year. The Forum
consists of forty to fifty Members invited to participate by
the Steering Committee. Members are prominent public personalities
with established integrity and reputation as well as representatives
of public and private institutions. The following groups of
institutions are represented at the Forum:
Institutions of the state: executive government agencies,
ministries, committees, the National Assembly, the judiciary,
including courts at all levels, local government representatives,
as well as the National Audit Office and Commission for the
Protection of Competition; NGOs: Bulgarian foundations and
associations, policy institutes, business associations, regional
development agencies, civic group representatives and European
and US foundations (through their local offices);
International organizations: the Council of Europe, USAID,
World Bank, Commission of the European Union, United Nations
Development Program, International Monetary Fund, etc.
The mandate of the Forum is based primarily on its role as
a representative public body overseeing the process, reviewing
the progress and adopting the agenda for future work. The
effort receives increased public credibility and legitimacy
through the endorsement of a forum of leading personalities
and institutions.
Its meetings ensure that the work carried out under the Coalition
2000 process by various institutions reflects a consensus of
the concerned public and private institutions.
|
Steering Committee |
|
While the Policy Forum is intended to foster a general political
and social consensus on the implementation of the initiative,
the Steering Committee (SC) provides the coordination of the
activities and outputs of the Coalition.
The group of NGOs which took the initiative -- Access Association,
Applied Research and Communications Fund (ARC Fund), Association
of Judges in Bulgaria, CSD, Center for Economic Development,
Center for Social Practices, Economic Policy Institute and
the Information Centre on the Council of Europe, Sofia --
invested a particular effort into ensuring the representative
nature of the SC. Thus the set-up of the SC reflects both
the history of the initiative as well as the consultations
and the publicity effort.
The Steering Committee meets regularly, approximately every
four-to-six weeks. The SC has a major role in the run-up to
the Policy Forum meetings. The Steering Committee prepares
the meeting agenda through advance consultations with the
Forum members and reports to the Forum on the activities and
outputs during the preceding year. The structure of the Steering
Committee is intended to ensure two main objectives:
|
- efficient management covering all aspects: political/institutional,
economic, legal, information, and interface with international
institutions;
- public-private dialogue and partnership as a key prerequisite
for a substantial impact.
|
Secretariat |
For the purpose of providing
permanent support to the work of the Steering Committee,
a Secretariat was set up at CSD to provide the day-to-day
operational management, logistical support and reporting.
This Coalition 2000 "model" has a number of advantages,
namely:
|
- the process is open in that it provides a mechanism through
which the major stakeholders governmental and non-governmental
organizations, business associations and international organizations
could provide input and participate in project design
and implementation in a way which makes best use of their
respective experience and expertise;
- it establishes a public-private dialogue and partnership
in a process of concern to the whole society;
- the process is transparent by means of regular dissemination
of information among concerned institutions and media outreach;
- the structure is flexible as it incorporates both public
and private institutions as well as prominent individuals.
The innovative approach to combating corruption, introduced
by Coalition 2000, has been acknowledged internationally.
A recent World Bank Report "The Road To Stability And
Prosperity In South Eastern Europe: A Regional Strategy Paper"
notes that in the field of anti-corruption/good governance
in SEE "there are some groundbreaking attempts by civil
society groups, such as Coalition 2000 in Bulgaria, which
has developed a common program of practical actions, with
active participation of government and national NGOs".
|
Corruption Monitoring
System |
|
Corruption Monitoring System (CMS) is a special tool developed
by Coalition 2000 experts. It is both a measuring and pressure
tool. CMS provides regular comprehensive summaries of public
attitudes and behavior, related to corruption, implementing
a set of corruption indexes [1]. The methodology
of corruption indexes is based on a relatively simple model
of corrupt behaviour, as a type of interaction between actors.
It includes the decomposition of corrupt behaviour into four
main elements: preconditions, practical interaction, action
results and future expectations. Respectively corruption indexes
are grouped in the following categories: attitudes towards
corruption, corrupt practices, assessment of the spread of
corruption and corruption expectations.
[1] Each corruption index summarizes the values of several variables and is presented
in a statistically normalized form: values of CI range from
0 to 10. The "0" symbolizes proximity to the "corruption
free" society while values close to "10" present
the negative side of the continuum (society predominated by
corruption). The corruption indexes are developed by Vitosha
Research (www.online.bg/vr).
|
|
|